It's time Africa moved from the periphery and became a global defender of the rule of law and sovereignty, experts say

The joint US-Israeli military strikes on Iran and Tehran's regional retaliation could give the African Union (AU) an opportunity to cement its identity as a defender of the UN charter and international law, but, as African experts argue, it seems to have missed it.

Dr. Wafula Okumu, executive director of The Borders Institute, says the AU's reaction to the Iran crisis clearly showed that the continental body suffers from what he describes as a "crisis of consistency".

According to Okumu, the AU Commission chairperson's "softly-worded" statement on the US-Israeli attack on Iran and its sharp condemnation of Iran's reaction portrayed Africa as succumbing to "selective Chartersim," a practice it has long condemned in others.

"The AU appeared not keen on outrightly calling out the US and Israel for attacking Iran. It seemed to be taking a safe and neutral position, but its reaction to Iran's retaliation lacked the tone of a peacemaker," Dr. Okumu told RT.

Dr. Okumu notes that the AU's "unsettling silence" on the breach of Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, which prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, appeared to be justifying the actions of the aggressors (the US and Israel) against the victim of the aggression (Iran).

"The AU ought to have outrightly called out the US and Israel for violating Article 2(4). It should have questioned whether the conditions stipulated in Article 51 had been met to justify the invasion of Iran," he said.

He explains that by adopting a posture of neutrality between an aggressor and a victim of that aggression, the AU "inadvertently weakened the very legal norms it purports to uphold."

"The AU was simply not bold enough to call out the US and Israel for infringing on the sovereignty of Iran," he said.

'The current geopolitical settings are confusing for Africa'

Nicodemus Minde, a peace and security governance researcher at the Institute for Security Studies in Nairobi, says Africa is good at the "art of selective application of principle',' especially in situations where powerful global players are the aggressors.

Minde argues that it was wrong for the AU to describe Iran's retaliation as a violation of sovereignty, while failing to apply the same language when condemning the attacks by the US and Israel.

"The AU is a victim of unjustifiable inconsistency. There is nothing wrong with lawfully defending a victim against an aggressor. Africa must move from the periphery and be a bold, universal defender of the rule of law and sovereignty," said Minde.

According to Minde, as much as it is right for the AU not to take sides in global crises, it is only right for it to side with the law while protecting its interests.

"The current geopolitical settings are complex and confusing for Africa, and the only thing that can shield Africa from being swallowed into the current global conflicts is by defending the law and speaking against violations committed by either the East or the West," said Minde.

He called for the formulation of a common foreign policy among African Union member states to help the continent navigate shifting geopolitics with principled consistency.

'A violation is a violation, whether committed by the US or Iran'

Chepkorir Sambu, a peace and security researcher and law lecturer at Kenya's Kabarak University, explains that for the AU to become an effective foreign policy actor on the global stage, it should firmly ground its actions in international law and consistently defend the UN Charter.

Sambu says the AU and its leadership should stop living under the unspoken fear of the US and other Western power players, and instead openly call them out when they are wrong.

"What the AU needed in the US-Israel versus Iran crisis was not taking a pro-Iran or anti-West stand, but simply being pro-rule-of-law. We cannot appear to be subtly supporting the actions of the aggressor while loudly condemning the victim," she argues.

She added, "Africa must be explicit in reaffirming Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter on the prohibition on the use of force as the cornerstone of international law. A violation is a violation, whether being committed by the US or Iran."

Sambu argues that the AU should apply the same legal and moral standard to all breaches of sovereignty, regardless of the actor. Condemning Iran's retaliation is legitimate, but it is legally and morally incoherent without a prior, and equally strong, condemnation of the initial attack.

'Africa has the power to be the voice of reason'

Dr. Okumu says the time is ripe for Africa's voice to dominate the global stage and that it matters now more than ever, especially as the world fragments amid great-power competition.

"Africa must come out as the voice and promoter of the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the non-use of force as the primary shields for less powerful states. The AU has a historic opportunity and a profound responsibility to be the world's leading champion of these norms," he told RT.

He says Africa should speak with a clear, principled, and unwavering voice, and be part of the geopolitical shifts and realignments without fear.

"Africa, through the AU, must avoid the trap of political expediency and embrace the disciplined legal consistency that is the true source of its authority. The continent has the power to be the voice of reason on the globe, and that power must be exercised," Dr. Okumu concluded.